E-ISSN 2250-0944 | ISSN 2250-1150
 

Peer Review Policy



The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards Review Policy and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Initial manuscript evaluation

The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review.

Type of Peer Review

Policy employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process.

How the referee is selected

Whenever possible, referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated.

Referee reports

Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work.

Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

How long does the review process take?

The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. Should the referee's reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. The Editor's decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the referees, which usually includes verbatim comments by the referees. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial referees who may then request another revision of a manuscript.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.

Editor's Decision is final

Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.



Most Viewed Articles
  • Stability Indicating HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Nicotinamide and Salicylic Acid
    FALGUNI TANDEL, PRATIMA MORE
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(2): 43-47
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.02.05

  • FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF NANO PARTICULATE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT OF ACNE
    ISHRAT S. CHHOWALA, DEVARSHI MADHUBHAI JANI, DR ABHAY DHARAMSI, DR. GAJANAN SHINDHE, DR. RAKESH PATEL.
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(2): 14-26
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.02.02

  • Antimicrobial activities, antioxidant and phytochemical analysis of methanol and aqueous leaf extract of Phyllathus muellerianus (KUNTZ) Exell
    FRED COOLBORN AKHARAIYI* ,ABAYOMI OLABANJO DINA
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(1): 29-38
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.01.04

  • Pharmacovigilance system and the future challenges in India-A Perspective
    *SANDHYA JAIN*, 1DR VIKAS JAIN, 2RADHA SHARMA
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(2): 27-31
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.02.03

  • Piperine : A Bioenhancer
    Amar Singh*, Amar Deep
    IJPRT. 2011; 1(1): 1-5
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/01.01.01

  • Most Downloaded
  • RELEASE KINETICS – CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS
    M. PADMAA PAARAKH , PREETHY ANI JOSE* , CM SETTY , G.V. PETER CHRISTOPER
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(1): 12-20
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.01.02

  • FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL PEEL OFF MASK
    SWETA V.KULKARNI*, DR.ARUN K.GUPTA, SHUBHAM BHAWSAR
    IJPRT. 2019; 9(2): 44-48
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/09.02.06

  • FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF NANO PARTICULATE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT OF ACNE
    ISHRAT S. CHHOWALA, DEVARSHI MADHUBHAI JANI, DR ABHAY DHARAMSI, DR. GAJANAN SHINDHE, DR. RAKESH PATEL.
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(2): 14-26
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.02.02

  • Medicinal vegetal use by traditional healers in Ekiti State of Nigeria for diabetes treatment
    AKHARAIYI, FRED COOLBORN , ADEROBA ADEYEMI ADEGBEMISIPO
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(1): 21-28
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.01.03

  • Modeling of solar/wind hybrid energy system using MTALAB simulink
    SHWETA GOYAL, SACHIN MISHRA, ANAMIKA BHATIA
    IJPRT. 2017; 7(2): 30-33
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/07.02.05

  • Most Cited Articles
  • Piperine : A Bioenhancer
    Amar Singh*, Amar Deep
    IJPRT. 2011; 1(1): 1-5
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/01.01.01
    Cited : 5 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Biodiversity and conservation Ferns Diversity in different forests of Dehradun district
    CHHAYA SINGH, BRIJESH KUMAR, ANJU RANI, KAMLA DHYANI, RAJ SINGH
    IJPRT. 2017; 7(2): 01-07
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/07.02.01
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • Stability Indicating HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Nicotinamide and Salicylic Acid
    FALGUNI TANDEL, PRATIMA MORE
    IJPRT. 2018; 8(2): 43-47
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/08.02.05
    Cited : 3 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • A Preliminary Investigation of Moringa Oleifera Lam Gum As a Pharmaceutical Excipient
    Dhiren P Shah*, Vineet C Jain, Hitesh P Dalvadi, Vinod D Ramani, Kajal G Patel, Mahesh G Saralai, Girish K Jani
    IJPRT. 2011; 1(1): 12-16
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/01.01.03
    Cited : 2 times [Click to see citing articles]

  • EFFECT OF SEED EXTRACTS OF Elettaria cardamomum ON CALCIUM OXALATE CRYSTALLIZATION
    Manish A. Patel, Paras K. Patel, Dr. Avinash K Seth
    IJPRT. 2011; 1(1): 21-25
    » Abstract » doi: 10.31838/ijprt/01.01.05
    Cited : 2 times [Click to see citing articles]